🔗 Share this article

Jennifer Lawrence has joined the growing list of actors who express doubts about the necessity of intimacy coordinators, revealing she opted against their services while working on her new movie Die My Love.

Understanding the Purpose of Intimacy Coordinators

Intimacy coordinators were introduced following the #MeToo era to guarantee the safety and comfort of performers during scenes involving partial undress and sexual content. However, numerous well-known performers including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their involvement, with several claiming they disrupt creative flow.

Lawrence's On-Set Perspective

Speaking during the Las Culturistas podcast, while discussing her new film where she portrays a woman experiencing mental health challenges, Lawrence commented: "We did not have such a professional, or maybe we had the option but didn't make use of their services... I felt completely safe with Rob."

She elaborated: "Rob is not pervy and very committed to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations mostly revolved around our children and relationships. There was absolutely no awkward tension or questions about personal boundaries."

"Had there been the slightest indication of discomfort, I definitely would have insisted on an intimacy coordinator. Numerous male actors get upset if you aren't interested in their attention, and subsequently the negative treatment starts. He was not like that."

Industry Recognition and Continuing Discussion

Recently, industry platform IMDb officially recognized on-set intimacy professionals as a separate category, alongside eleven other crew positions including dance direction, catering, and puppet operation. Before this, they were grouped under "miscellaneous staff" instead of having their specific credit.

Despite this recognition, these professionals still encounter public discussion suggesting they might not be required standards, with high-profile actors rejecting their involvement. Jennifer's viewpoint mirrors that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier shared she declined professional supervision while filming alongside Jon Hamm on The Morning Show.

Jennifer's Perspective

"He proved to be extremely respectful – I mean each action, every cut, 'Are you OK?" she remembered. "The scenes were additionally carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with talented directors, suitable lighting. So, minimal preparation is needed."

Aniston continued, "Production suggested, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Honestly, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're experienced professionals – we can handle this. And we had Mimi present."

Additional Cases and Professional Response

Although including numerous scenes of sexual activity and regular undress, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's acclaimed film about a sex worker and a wealthy heir – filmed without an intimacy coordinator.

Mikey Madison stated she and co-star Mark Eydelshteyn "decided it would be best to keep it small."

"The role I play is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had researched Sean's films and recognized his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an performer, I treated it as part of my job."

These statements provoked strong reactions from industry professionals, similar to the reaction to Gwyneth Paltrow's recent comments, who earlier this year revealed that working on her forthcoming project Marty Supreme marked her first encounter with the relatively new profession, which she "was unaware of previously."

Paltrow's Perspective

During filming about comfort level with a specific move alongside co-star Timothée Chalamet, the actress answered: "I belong to the generation where you get naked, you assume position, the camera's on."

She continued that she and her co-star then informed the professional: "We believe we're good. You can step back.' I can't speak to how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is instructing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, very stifled by that."

Professional Reaction

Following these comments, former Channel 4 drama head Caroline Hollick described them as "concerning" and highlighted that most of those opposing these professionals have established careers to command their own power and protection on film sets.

"Occasionally an performer shares opinions about whether they appreciate intimacy coordinators or not," commented the executive. "Gwyneth Paltrow stated she grew up in a time when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood working with a man considerably junior than her, although likely he is comfortable, I considered it quite an irresponsible statement."

Actor's Viewpoint

The veteran actor, meanwhile, expressed that he believes the primary responsibility during intimate sequences rests with the male actor, rather than a external professional.

"Based on my career, you assume duty as the male actor to ensure the woman is at ease, you discuss it thoroughly," he explained. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's extremely careful but appears like it's occurring organically, which is hopefully what authentic performance appears as."