🔗 Share this article

The future president of the Oxford Union has been removed from his position after losing a no-confidence vote that came after his disputed online comments about the conservative activist.

The motion against George Abaraonye reached the required two-thirds threshold to oust him from his position, according to an statement from the organization.

Contentious Posts

The controversy began after Mr Abaraonye reportedly posted messages on online platforms that appeared to welcome the death of Charlie Kirk, who was shot dead while addressing a college in Utah.

According to reports, one Instagram post reportedly stated "Charlie Kirk got shot loool" - using an elongated version of the phrase 'lol'.

The president-elect is also reported to have written in a WhatsApp chat with fellow students appearing to express approval of the event.

Vote Outcome

The vote of confidence took place over the recent days, with outcomes announced on Tuesday.

Official notices indicated that over twelve hundred votes were cast supporting no confidence, while just over five hundred were opposed the motion.

The announcement stated that the future president was considered to have resigned in accordance with the society's regulations.

Election Controversies

Proceedings were informally suspended early on the previous day after the election official was reportedly subjected to "obstruction, intimidation, and unwarranted hostility" from several representatives.

In a response, Mr Abaraonye claimed that the vote tally had been stopped because electoral officials believed "no valid outcome could be reached as a result of process errors".

His response unequivocally denied that any person appointed by the student had engaged in threatening or obstructive conduct.

Ongoing Dispute

The president-elect stated that significant concerns had been submitted to the disciplinary committee and that he continued as the elected leader.

His comment added that George was "grateful and honored to have the backing of significantly more than half of university members" who supported a "secure voting process and oppose efforts to undermine the electoral process".

Opponents have said that any failure to remove him would "demonstrate internationally that the society has chosen ideology over integrity".

External Responses

On Friday, Kirk's former chief of staff presented an public message to the society on a related program podcast.

The message criticized the society of becoming a place where "presidents of the union publicly celebrate the killing of a political opponent".

The communication indicated that if the student were to remain in post, supporters would "personally contact every American political speaker who has ever spoken at the society and advise them against future participation".

The society had previously criticized the student's comments after the activist's killing and stated that complaints submitted about him had been referred for official review.

The student leader had been one of multiple members to debate with the activist at the union in May.